Sforza v. The City of New York et al
| Chris Sforza |
| The City of New York, John and Jane Doe, McDonald's Corporation and John and Doe |
| 1:2007cv06122 |
| June 29, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Denise L. Cote |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
53
OPINION AND ORDER #97359 re: 37 MOTION to Dismiss. filed by Luigi Pagano, Ralph Perfetto, Christopher Newsom, Michael McGovern, John Adriano, Jordan Bistany, The City of New York, Joseph Bonner, Liz Salinas, Dennis Morgano, Bryan Hanson. The City D efendants' November 3, 2009 motion to dismiss and for summary judgment against plaintiff's 1983 and 1985 claims is granted, except that it is denied with regard to plaintiff's claim for municipal liability based on the use of excessive force in violation of 1983. Plaintiff's state law claims for relief under the New York Human Rights Law and New York Administrative Code are dismissed against the City Defendants. A conference will be held with the parties to discuss the schedule for the remainder of the litigation and the issue of supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state-law claims. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 3/31/09) (tro) Modified on 4/2/2009 (mro).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
