Anne Bryant v. AB Droits Audiovisuels et al
Case Number: 1:2007cv06395
Filed: July 13, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
Presiding Judge: Sidney H. Stein
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 11, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 196 OPINION AND ORDER: Accordingly, for all the foregoing reasons, plaintiff's motion for reconsideration of my June 2, 2017 Opinion and Order is denied in all respects. So Ordered. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman on 7/11/2017) Copies Sent By Chambers. (js)
June 2, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 188 OPINION AND ORDER re: 115 MOTION for Sanctions filed by Anne Bryant, 122 MOTION for Sanctions filed by Anne Bryant. Because plaintiff has offered no evidence that Phares has made an argument or offered evidence that was entirely meritle ss or that Phares acted in bad faith, plaintiff's motion for sanctions is denied. Accordingly, for all the foregoing reasons, plaintiff's motion for sanctions against Gloria C. Phares, Esq. pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1927 is denied in all respects. The Clerk of the Court is requested to mark Docket Items 115 and 122 closed. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman on 6/2/2017) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (ras)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Anne Bryant v. AB Droits Audiovisuels et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?