Anne Bryant v. AB Droits Audiovisuels et al
1:2007cv06395 |
July 13, 2007 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
Sidney H. Stein |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Other |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 196 OPINION AND ORDER: Accordingly, for all the foregoing reasons, plaintiff's motion for reconsideration of my June 2, 2017 Opinion and Order is denied in all respects. So Ordered. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman on 7/11/2017) Copies Sent By Chambers. (js) |
Filing 188 OPINION AND ORDER re: 115 MOTION for Sanctions filed by Anne Bryant, 122 MOTION for Sanctions filed by Anne Bryant. Because plaintiff has offered no evidence that Phares has made an argument or offered evidence that was entirely meritle ss or that Phares acted in bad faith, plaintiff's motion for sanctions is denied. Accordingly, for all the foregoing reasons, plaintiff's motion for sanctions against Gloria C. Phares, Esq. pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1927 is denied in all respects. The Clerk of the Court is requested to mark Docket Items 115 and 122 closed. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman on 6/2/2017) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (ras) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Anne Bryant v. AB Droits Audiovisuels et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.