Vladimir et al v. Bioenvision, Inc. et al
| Bert Vladimir |
| Bioenvision, Inc., Christpoher B. Wood and James S. Scibetta |
| 1:2007cv06416 |
| July 13, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Suffolk |
| Andrew J. Peck |
| Sidney H. Stein |
| Securities/Commodities |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
75
OPINION AND ORDER #97341 Plaintiffs either have not alleged a duty to disclose the merger discussions or have failed to set forth their securities fraud claims with the requisite level of particularity. Plaintiffs therefore have failed to state a cla im upon which relief can be granted. The Bioenvision defendants motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is granted without prejudice. Perseus-Soross motion to dismiss is also granted without prejudice. If plaintiffs intend to submit a second supplemental amended complaint, they shall do so within 14 days of the entry of this Opinion and Order. (Signed by Judge Sidney H. Stein on 3/31/09) (mme) Modified on 4/1/2009 (mro).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
