Truong v. Kratzman et al
| Mac Truong |
| Steven P. Kratzman, Mellinger Sanders, Kratzman LLC., Novalyn L. Winfield, Barbara Ostoth and Coldwell Banker Real Estate Corporation |
| 1:2007cv07070 |
| August 8, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Jed S. Rakoff |
| Torts to Land |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 Tort Claim |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
ORDER: for 14 Report and Recommendations. The Court has considered thoroughly all of Truong's arguments and finds them to be without merit. For these reasons and for the reasons set forth in Judge Fox's Report, the Court adopts Judge Fox 's report (docket entry no. 14), overrules Truong's objection to Judge Fox's Order, and denies Truong's application to reinstate the above-captioned action. This Order resolves Plaintiffs Application Pursuant to Court Orders Seeki ng Leave to File or Reinstate New Action, dated November 28, 2008, Plaintiffs June 1, 2009, Application for Leave to File New Action With the Clerk of This Court, and docket entry no. 16. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 7/17/2009) Copies Mailed By Chambers.(tve)
|
|
Filing
14
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: For the reasons set forth above, I recommend that the plaintiff's application be denied. Objections to R&R due by 6/15/2009 (Signed by Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox on 5/29/2009) Copy Mailed By Chambers.(rw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
