Modavox, Inc. v. Tacoda, Inc.

Modavox, Inc. v. Tacoda, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Modavox, Inc.
Defendant:	Tacoda, Inc.
Case Number:	1:2007cv07088
Filed:	August 9, 2007
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	XX Out of State
Presiding Judge:	Colleen McMahon
Nature of Suit:	Patent
Cause of Action:	35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 25, 2009	Filing 44 MARKMAN CLAIM CONSTRUCTION RULINGS AND SCHEDULING ORDER FOR THE SUBMISSION OF EXTRINSIC EVIDENCE ON CERTAIN: The parties are directed to provide the court with extrinsic evidence to support a construction of the term "function" that is not precluded by the extrinsic evidence. The parties have thirty days to offer the court any extrinsic evidence that would support a proposed definition, including expert testimony; they shall provide their evidence simultaneously. It will not be necessa ry to put in reply papers. After I have had an opportunity to digest the parties' submissions, I will schedule a further hearing. The period for submitting infringement contentions, which I believe was to commence with the issuance of this decision, will begin to run when I issue the Markman decision construing "function." (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 3/24/2009) (jpo)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 25, 2009

Filing 44 MARKMAN CLAIM CONSTRUCTION RULINGS AND SCHEDULING ORDER FOR THE SUBMISSION OF EXTRINSIC EVIDENCE ON CERTAIN: The parties are directed to provide the court with extrinsic evidence to support a construction of the term "function" that is not precluded by the extrinsic evidence. The parties have thirty days to offer the court any extrinsic evidence that would support a proposed definition, including expert testimony; they shall provide their evidence simultaneously. It will not be necessa ry to put in reply papers. After I have had an opportunity to digest the parties' submissions, I will schedule a further hearing. The period for submitting infringement contentions, which I believe was to commence with the issuance of this decision, will begin to run when I issue the Markman decision construing "function." (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 3/24/2009) (jpo)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Modavox, Inc. v. Tacoda, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Modavox, Inc.
Represented By:	John Jerome Skinner, Jr.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Tacoda, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?