Jenkins v. N.Y.S. Banking Dept.
Plaintiff: Rachel Jenkins
Defendant: N.Y.S. Banking Dept.
Case Number: 1:2007cv11317
Filed: December 17, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: Kings
Presiding Judge: John G. Koeltl
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 6, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 13 OPINION AND ORDER re: 17 MOTION to Amend/Correct filed by Rachel Jenkins. For the reasons further set forth in this Opinion and Order, plaintiff's motion to amend her complaint is granted. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman on 3/6/2009) Copies Mailed By Chambers.(tve)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jenkins v. N.Y.S. Banking Dept.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rachel Jenkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: N.Y.S. Banking Dept.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?