Merck Eprova AG et al v. Prothera, Inc.
||Merck Eprova AG and Merck KGaA
||January 3, 2008
||US District Court for the Southern District of New York
||Foley Square Office
||XX Out of U.S.
||Richard M. Berman
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|October 6, 2009
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that for the reasons set forth above, Merck's application to redact portions of the publicly-filed version of my 9/17/09 Memorandum and Order is denied, and that document shall be unsealed. This order is stayed for 3 days so that Merck may appeal this ruling if it is so advised. (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 10/6/09) Copies sent by chambers(cd)
|September 17, 2009
ORDER: Today I issued a decision on the plaintiffs' motion to disqualify one of the law firms representing the defendant. I filed that decision under seal because of the possibility that it contains information confidential to the parties. By Se ptember 28, 2009, the parties shall submit papers identifying what, if any, information they request to be redacted from the version of the decision that will be publicly filed and providing a detailed basis for any such request. These submissions may themselves be filed under seal. (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 9/17/2009) Copies Mailed By Chambers.(jpo)
|June 8, 2009
ORDER granting 38 Motion to Seal Document, subject to review of redactions by J. Francis. Current docket Entry No. 35, ie., Plaintiffs' 5/22/09 letter which was thereafter endorsed by the Court, shall be removed from the docket for this action and replaced with Plaintiffs' redacted version of the 5/22/09 letter. The original letter shall be maintained under seal by the Clerk of the Court, subject to Magistrate Judge Francis review and determination. (Signed by Judge Richard M. Berman on 6/8/09) (cd)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?