Vitrano v. State Farm Insurance Company

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Southern District Vitrano v. State Farm Insurance Company

Vitrano v. State Farm Insurance Company

Plaintiff:	Richard Vitrano
Defendant:	State Farm Insurance Company
Case Number:	1:2008cv00103
Filed:	January 7, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	XX Out of State
Presiding Judge:	John G. Koeltl
Nature of Suit:	Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 19, 2009	Filing 46 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re:#98169 29 MOTION for Summary Judgment. For the reasons stated above, the motion for summary judgment is granted with respect to the five paintings that were seized by the United States. The remaining portion of the m otion for summary judgment is denied without prejudice to allow for additional discovery. The Clerk is directed to close Docket No. 29. SO ORDERED. filed by State Farm Insurance Company. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 10/19/2009) (jmi) Modified on 10/22/2009 (eef).
March 4, 2009	Filing 34 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER #97208 that plaintiff's time to respond to the defendant's motion for summary is extended until 6/26/09. The defendant's time to reply is extended until 7/24/09. The plaintiff's application for the app ointment of counsel is DENIED, because the plaintiff has failed to show a likelihood of success on the merits of his claim. ( Reply due by 7/24/2009. Response due by 6/26/2009) (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 3/3/09) (cd) Modified on 3/12/2009 (mro).

Date Filed

Document Text

October 19, 2009

Filing 46 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re:#98169 29 MOTION for Summary Judgment. For the reasons stated above, the motion for summary judgment is granted with respect to the five paintings that were seized by the United States. The remaining portion of the m otion for summary judgment is denied without prejudice to allow for additional discovery. The Clerk is directed to close Docket No. 29. SO ORDERED. filed by State Farm Insurance Company. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 10/19/2009) (jmi) Modified on 10/22/2009 (eef).

March 4, 2009

Filing 34 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER #97208 that plaintiff's time to respond to the defendant's motion for summary is extended until 6/26/09. The defendant's time to reply is extended until 7/24/09. The plaintiff's application for the app ointment of counsel is DENIED, because the plaintiff has failed to show a likelihood of success on the merits of his claim. ( Reply due by 7/24/2009. Response due by 6/26/2009) (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 3/3/09) (cd) Modified on 3/12/2009 (mro).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vitrano v. State Farm Insurance Company
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard Vitrano
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: State Farm Insurance Company
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?