Weather v. City of Mount Vernon et al
Plaintiff: Paul Weather
Defendant: City of Mount Vernon and Michael Marcucilli
Case Number: 1:2008cv00192
Filed: January 9, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: Westchester
Presiding Judge: Robert P. Patterson
Presiding Judge: Lisa Margaret Smith
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 31, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 46 OPINION AND ORDER: On April 19, 2012, Paul Weather, Plaintiff/Appellee, moved under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1988 for an award of attorneys fees as the prevailing party on appeal. Accordingly, for the reasons discussed herein, Plaintiff/Appellee's request for attorney fees of $33,620.00 and printing costs of $432.00 is approved. Enter judgment. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Robert P. Patterson on 1/31/2013) Copies Faxed By Chambers. (ja)
May 27, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 41 OPINION AND ORDER re: 38 MOTION for Attorney Fees filed by Paul Weather. Plaintiff has established that his hourly rate and requested time is generally reasonable. Deductions will be made, however, to compensate for time entries that reflect admin istrative or clerical work, and to account for time spent traveling. Expert fees are permissibly included as a part of Plaintiffs costs. Plaintiff is hereby awarded at total of $81,276.13. (Signed by Judge Robert P. Patterson on 5/27/2011) Copies Faxed By Chambers. (jar)
March 22, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 36 OPINION AND ORDER:#100079 The jury found Defendant Marcucilli liable on Plaintiffs claim, indicating that they necessarily found his conduct to be unreasonable in view of the circumstances confronting him at the time of the incident. The law protecti ng individuals from excessive force applied by state actors is clearly established, and there is no authority to indicate that a reasonable officer facing the circumstances confronting Sergeant Marcucilli would have believed his actions to be a lawful response to Mr. Weather's conduct. Accordingly Sergeant Marcucilli is not eligible for qualified immunity. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Robert P. Patterson on 3/22/2011) Copies Faxed By Chambers. (lnl) Modified on 3/23/2011 (jab).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Weather v. City of Mount Vernon et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Paul Weather
Represented By: Francis Xavier Young
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Mount Vernon
Represented By: Hina Sherwani
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Marcucilli
Represented By: Hina Sherwani
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?