National Association of Letter Carriers, AFL-CIO et al v. United States Postal Service et al
| National Association of Letter Carriers, AFL-CIO and American Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO |
| United States Postal Service and United States Postal Service Office of Inspector General |
| 1:2008cv00458 |
| January 17, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of State |
| Denny Chin |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 (a) Complaint in the Nature of Mandamus |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
PRIVACY ACT ORDER: Any objection to the production and use of such documents and information no the ground that they are protected by the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, is overruled. This order is without prejudice to any other objections the parties may have to producing such documents and information. (Signed by Judge Denny Chin on 4/29/2009) (jpo)
|
|
Filing
12
OPINION #97311 re: 8 MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint filed by United States Postal Service Office of Inspector General, United States Postal Service. For the reasons set forth herein, the Government's motion to dismiss is denied. The parties shall attend a pre-trial conference on 4/6/09 at 11:00 a.m. (Signed by Judge Denny Chin on 3/30/09) (tro) Modified on 3/31/2009 (mro).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
