Percinthe v. Julien et al
Plaintiff: Smith Percinthe
Defendant: Paul E. Julien, Heather Almodoval, Andrew W. Rheome and S. Grant
Case Number: 1:2008cv00893
Filed: January 25, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: Oneida
Presiding Judge: Shira A. Scheindlin
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 17, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 70 ORDER....plaintiff request for a new trial is without merit and hence denied. In addition, because Percinthe is represented by counsel he has no right to file pro se motions and should refrain from doing so in the future. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 2/3/10) (cd)
July 30, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER: Percinthe's response to Almodoval's motion, which arrived after the motion was decided in Almodoval's favor and which I have now carefully reviewed, is indeed identical, in all relevant respects, to Percinthe's response to the motion made by defendants Julien, Rheome, and Grant. Because Percinthe was not prejudiced when I decided both motions before receiving his response to Almodoval's motion, it is hereby ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court close this case. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 7/30/2009) (jpo)
July 24, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 49 OPINION AND ORDER:#97783 For the foregoing reasons, summary judgment is granted to defendants Almodoval, Rheome, and Grant, and denied as to defendant Julien. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this motion (Docket # 34 and 46). The Pro Se O ffice is directed to send Mr. Percinthe the form necessary to request appointment of counsel. Percinthe is directed to complete that form and return it to this Court forthwith. A conference is scheduled for September 11, 2009 at 4:30 p.m. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 7/24/2009) (jfe) Modified on 7/28/2009 (eef).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Percinthe v. Julien et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Smith Percinthe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Paul E. Julien
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Heather Almodoval
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew W. Rheome
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: S. Grant
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?