Cates v. Potter et al
Plaintiff: Elliot Ulysses Cates
Defendant: John Potter, Cheryl Williams, Vanessa Duncan-Smith and Toniette Henry
Case Number: 1:2008cv01529
Filed: February 14, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: New York
Presiding Judge: Harold Baer
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 19, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 21 OPINION AND ORDER#97242, that Defendants motion to dismiss Plaintiffs Amended Complaint is GRANTED. Pursuant to the discussion set forth in Footnote 6 of this Opinion and Order, and to satisfy their obligations under Local Rule 7.1(c), the Court inst ructs the Assistant United States Attorney assigned to this case to serve Plaintiff with printed copies of the unreported decisions cited in their submissions to this Court within two (2) days of the date of this Opinion and Order. Plaintiff shall ha ve ten (10) business days from the date he is served with such unreported cases to file a supplemental opposition based solely on arguments in opposition to application of legal principles set forth in the unreported cases cited by the Government. If such a supplemental opposition is timely filed, the Government shall have five (5) business days to file a supplemental reply thereto. If no supplemental opposition is filed as of the date that is ten (10) business days after the date that Plaintiff is served with the aforementioned materials, the Clerk of the Court is instructed to close this case and any open motions and remove this case from my docket. The Court expects that the U.S. Attorneys Office and all other counsel who oppose pro se litigants will strictly adhere to Local Rule 7.1(c) in the future. filed by Vanessa Duncan-Smith, Cheryl Williams, Toniette Henry. (Signed by Judge Harold Baer on 3/18/09) (pl) Modified on 3/19/2009 (pl). Modified on 3/20/2009 (mro).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cates v. Potter et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Elliot Ulysses Cates
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Potter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cheryl Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Vanessa Duncan-Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Toniette Henry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?