Davis et al v. Abercrombie & Fitch Co. et al
| Shoneca Davis, Dawud Eudelle, Jaclyn Pagnotta, David Pomales and Kenneth Fingerman |
| Abercrombie & Fitch Co., Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc. and Abercrombie & Fitch Trading Co. |
| 1:2008cv01859 |
| February 25, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Queens |
| P. Kevin Castel |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
85
FINDINGS AND ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING THE CLASS SETTLEMENT, DIRECTING THE ISSUANCE OF NOTICE TO THE CLASS, AND SCHEDULING A SETTLEMENT HEARING: It is hereby ordered, adjudged and decreed as follows: The Court hereby appoints the law firm of Vlad eck, Waldman, Elias & Engelhard, P.C. by Debra L. Raskin, Milton L. Williams, and Maia Goodell as counsel for the Class, finding that these counsel meet the requirements of Rule 23(g) (collectively referred to as "Plaintiffs' Counsel") . The Court hereby approves the appointment of the Named Plaintiffs as representatives of the Class for settlement purposes only, as set forth herein. A final hearing shall be held on September 10, 2009 at 2 p.m. to consider whether the class meets the requirements for certification as a class under F.R.C.P. 23(a) and (b)(3), for settlement purposes only, as set forth herein. (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 6/2/2009) (jpo)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
