Collins v. Artus

Collins v. Artus

Petitioner:	Peter Collins
Respondent:	Dale Artus
Case Number:	1:2008cv01936
Filed:	February 27, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	Clinton
Presiding Judge:	P. Kevin Castel
Presiding Judge:	James C. Francis
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 26, 2009	Filing 23 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The petition for a writ of habeas corpus was referred to Magistrate Judge James C. Francis for a report and recommendation. The R&R is adopted in its entirety and the petition is DENIED. The Clerk shall ente r judgment for the respondent. Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right and, accordingly, a certificate of appealability will not issue. The Court certifies that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 8/25/2009) (jfe)
May 22, 2009	Filing 22 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re: 2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Peter Collins. For the reasons above, I recommend that Mr. Collins' petition for a writ of habeas corpus be denied. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C § 636(b) (1) and Rules 72 , 6(a), and 6(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties shall have ten (10) days from this date to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation. Objections to R&R due by 6/11/2009. (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 5/22/2009) Copies Mailed By Chambers.(tve)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 26, 2009

Filing 23 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The petition for a writ of habeas corpus was referred to Magistrate Judge James C. Francis for a report and recommendation. The R&R is adopted in its entirety and the petition is DENIED. The Clerk shall ente r judgment for the respondent. Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right and, accordingly, a certificate of appealability will not issue. The Court certifies that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 8/25/2009) (jfe)

May 22, 2009

Filing 22 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re: 2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Peter Collins. For the reasons above, I recommend that Mr. Collins' petition for a writ of habeas corpus be denied. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C § 636(b) (1) and Rules 72 , 6(a), and 6(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties shall have ten (10) days from this date to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation. Objections to R&R due by 6/11/2009. (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 5/22/2009) Copies Mailed By Chambers.(tve)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Collins v. Artus
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Peter Collins
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Dale Artus
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?