PeterCam S.A./N.V. v. Vivendi, S.A. et al
| PeterCam S.A./N.V. |
| Vivendi, S.A., Jean-marie Messier and Guillaume Hannezo |
| 1:2008cv02056 |
| February 29, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of U.S. |
| Unassigned |
| Securities/Commodities |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 77 Securities Fraud |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
ORDER GRANTING ANTHONY J. HARWOOD'S NOTICE OF MOTION FOR LEAVE TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL. It is hereby ordered and decreed that Anthony J. Harwood is removed as counsel of record for plaintiffs in the cases listed above. (Signed by Judge Richard J. Holwell on 4/14/2009) (jpo)
|
|
Filing
7
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION #97239: Accordingly, Hannezo's motion is GRANTED and the above captioned actions are dismissed without prejudice save for the stayed actions. The stayed plaintiffs' motion to lift the stay is GRANTED, but only for the purposes of serving Hannezo-for all other purposes the actions remain stayed. However, in light of the adjournment of the trial date to September 29, 2009, any party may move to lift the stay on the grounds that such a step would be efficient. The stayed plaintiffs must serve Hannezo within 60 days of the date of this order or their actions will be dismissed. (Signed by Judge Richard J. Holwell on 3/16/2009) (jfe)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
