Jordan v. David Chalvisan Paper Fibers Corp
Plaintiff: Willie Jordan
Defendant: David Chalvisan Paper Fibers Corp.
Case Number: 1:2008cv02191
Filed: March 5, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: Bronx
Presiding Judge: William H. Pauley
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 29, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 22 OPINION AND ORDER:#98097 Accordingly, for all the foregoing reasons, defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted in all respects. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman on 9/29/2009) Copies Mailed By Chambers.(jfe) Modified on 9/30/2009 (eef).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jordan v. David Chalvisan Paper Fibers Corp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Willie Jordan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Chalvisan Paper Fibers Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?