Burton v. Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. et al
Frederick Burton |
Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., Merrill Lynch and Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. |
1:2008cv03037 |
March 25, 2008 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Securities/Commodities Office |
XX Out of State |
Loretta A. Preska |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 72 OPINION AND ORDER: For reasons further set forth in said Order, the Defendants' motion to dismiss the Complaint [dkt. no. 51.] is GRANTED. Prior to thefiling of the motion to dismiss, Plaintiffs were given the opportunity to correct deficiencies pointed out by Defendants. Plaintiffs availed themselves of this opportunity prior to serving the First Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint with the understanding that no further amendments would bepermitted. In addition, the grounds for dis missal set forth above demonstrate that further amendment would be futile. Accordingly, the dismissal is with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court shall mark this action closed and all pending motions denied as moot. (51 in 1:08-cv-03037-LAP) MOTION to Dismiss filed by IN RE: Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., Auction Rate Securities (ARS) Marketing Litigation, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., Merrill Lynch. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 3/31/10) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:09-md-02030-LAP, 1:08-cv-03037-LAP(db) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.