Commonwealth of Kentucky v. Purdue Pharma, L.P.
Commonwealth of Kentucky |
Purdue Pharma, L.P. |
1:2008cv03380 |
April 7, 2008 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
XX Out of State |
Sidney H. Stein |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 47 OPINION AND ORDER: Accordingly, because this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over the action, defendants' motion to stay the remand order is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. (Signed by Judge Sidney H. Stein on 10/6/2011) (js) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Commonwealth of Kentucky v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Commonwealth of Kentucky | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Purdue Pharma, L.P. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.