Defer LP v. Raymond James Financial, Inc., et al
| Defer LP |
| Raymond James Financial, Inc.,, Raymond James & Associates, Inc. and Raymond James Financial Services, Inc. |
| 1:2008cv03449 |
| April 8, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Shirley Wohl Kram |
| Securities/Commodities |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
59
MEMORANDUM OPINION: For the foregoing reasons, defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint [DI 53] is granted in all respects except that motion is denied with respect to plaintiff Gold's (1) Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 claim against RJA for the period November 2007 through February 13, 2008, and (2) the Section 20(a) claim against RJF based thereon. (Signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 9/1/2010) (jpo) (Main Document 59 replaced on 9/2/2010) (jpo).
|
|
Filing
45
MEMORANDUM OPINION #98034 For the foregoing reasons, defendants' motion to dismiss the First Amended Class Action Complaint [docket item 36] is granted. Nevertheless, it is far from clear that plaintiff cannot state a legally sufficient claim ag ainst some or all of the defendants. Accordingly, plaintiff is granted leave to amend on or before October 16, 2009. SO ORDERED. ( Amended Pleadings due by 10/16/2006.) (Signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 9/17/2009) (jmi) Modified on 9/18/2009 (eef).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
