Sinoying Logistics Pte Ltd. v. Yi Da Xin Trading Corporation
Plaintiff: Sinoying Logistics Pte Ltd. and Acoaxet Shipping PTE LTD
Defendant: Yi Da Xin Trading Corporation (Philippines), Yi Da Xin Trading Co. Ltd. (Hong Kong), Yi Da Xin (Hong Kong) Limited and HSBC Bank USA, N.A.
Intervenor_plaintiff: The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited
Garnishee: HSBC Bank USA, N.A.
Case Number: 1:2008cv03754
Filed: April 21, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: XX Out of U.S.
Presiding Judge: Denny Chin
Nature of Suit: Marine
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 7, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER GRANTING HONGKONG BANK'S MOTION TO INTERVENE: The Court having considered the matters presented, it is hereby ORDERED that Hongkong Bank be made a party to the action as an intervenor-plaintiff under Fed. R. Civ. P. 24(a); and it is furthe r ORDERED that Hongkong Bank file its complaint in intervention (the "Hongkong Bank Complaint") within one week of entry of this Order; and it is further ORDERED, in accordance with Local Admiralty Rule E.2(a) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3), t hat upon the filing of the Hongkong Bank Complaint, the Clerk shall furnish a conformed copy of the Hongkong Bank Complaint to Michael O. Ware, John A. Marsala, Delisha T. Powell or any other employee or agent of Mayer Brown LLP, who are hereby appoi nted special process servers directed to deliver the Hongkong Bank Complaint and a copy of this Order to HSBC Bank USA. Upon such delivery, the funds of YDX presently in the hands of HSBC Bank USA will stand attached and garnished in favor of Hongkon g Bank; and it is further ORDERED that HSBC Bank USA need not make a statement under CPLR 6219 or otherwise unless it believes that facts recited in this Order are inaccurate; and it is further ORDERED that Hongkong Bank give YDX prompt electronic no tice of the attachment as contemplated by Local Admiralty Rule B.2; and it is further ORDERED that Hongkong Bank's Illation under CPLR 6211(b) to confirm its attachment may be joined with a motion for summary judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a) (the "Hongkong Bank Motion"). The Hongkong Bank Motion must be posted on the Court's ECF system within 10 days of the delivery of the Hongkong Bank Complaint to HSBC Bank USA. The Hongkong Bank Motion is to be made returnable at 9:30 A.M. on any Court day not less than 45 days after ECF posting. In the notice of motion on the Hongkong Bank Motion, counsel are directed to set a deadline for service of the answering papers that is no more than ten days before the return date. (The return date is not an appearance date. The Court will advise the parties if it believes that oral argument will assist it in its disposition of the motion.) Promptly upon the ECF filing of the Hongkong Bank Motion, Hongkong Bank's attorneys are to work diligently with the Clerk (see ww\-vl.nysd. uscourts.gov/cases/show.php?dlF=fornls&id=18 for instructions) to effect mail service, under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(h)(2) and 4(f)(2)(c)(ii), on YDX in the Philippines of this Order, the Hongkong Ba nk Complaint and the Hongkong Bank Motion; and it is further ORDERED that the schedule set in the immediately preceding paragraph is without prejudice to YDX's rights (i) to move at any time under CPLR 6223(a) for the vacatur of the attachment i n favor of Hongkong Bank and (ii) to ask the Court to move up the return date of the Hongkong Bank Motion; and it is further ORDERED that plaintiffs' attorneys are to facilitate Hongkong Bank's service of papers on YDX by furnishing counsel with best known electronic and physical addresses for YDX; and it is further ORDERED that no funds attached in this action be released from any garnishee bank except by further order on notice to all appearing parties; and it is further ORDERED that the caption herein be amended to read as follows: Sinoying Logistics Pte. Ltd. and Acoaxet Shipping Pte. Ltd.,Plaintiffs,-and-The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited, Intervenor-Plaintiff,- against-Ya Da Xin Trading Corporation (Philippines), Ya Da Xin Trading Co. Ltd. (Hong Kong) and Ya Da Xin (Hong Kong)Limited, Defendants. (Signed by Judge Denny Chin on 5/7/2009) (jpo)
April 13, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER RELEASING CERTAIN ATTACHED FUNDS that $156,390.28 from the HSBC Wire is released from attachment, with garnishee HSBC Bank USA directed to send the released $156,390.28 to Hongkong Bank in accordance with the original wire instruction s for the HSBC Wire; that, except as provided in the preceding paragraph, no funds attached in this action are to be released form any garnishee bank except by further order on notice to all appearing parties. (Signed by Judge Denny Chin on 4/13/09) (cd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sinoying Logistics Pte Ltd. v. Yi Da Xin Trading Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sinoying Logistics Pte Ltd.
Represented By: Michael J. Frevola
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Acoaxet Shipping PTE LTD
Represented By: Michael J. Frevola
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Yi Da Xin Trading Corporation (Philippines)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Yi Da Xin Trading Co. Ltd. (Hong Kong)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Yi Da Xin (Hong Kong) Limited
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HSBC Bank USA, N.A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Intervenor_plaintiff: The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited
Represented By: Michael O. Ware
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Garnishee: HSBC Bank USA, N.A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?