Valez v. The City of New York et al
| Wilfredo Valez |
| The City of New York, Gianpaol Dilisio, Francesco Turdo, Vivian Pecoraro, Jane Doe and John Doe |
| 1:2008cv03875 |
| April 24, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| Kings |
| Denise L. Cote |
| Debra C. Freeman |
| Both |
| Federal Question |
| 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
69
OPINION & ORDER granting re: 61 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c), filed by The City of New York, Gianpaol Dilisio. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment for the defendants on all federal claims. The state law claims are dismissed without prejudice to refiling in state court. The Clerk of Court shall close the case. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 4/12/10) (cd)
|
|
Filing
56
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER #98124 Finding no clear error in Magistrate Judge Freeman's Report, the Report is adopted. Defendants January 29, 2009, letter motion requesting that the Court enforce the October 1, 2008 settlement agreement is deni ed. The parties' failure to file written objections precludes appellate review of this decision. See Caidor v. Onondaga County, 517 F.3d 601, 604 (2d Cir. 2008). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 10/1/2009) (jmi) Modified on 10/2/2009 (eef).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
