Plumbers and Pipefitters Local Union No. 630 Pension-Annuity Trust Fund et al v. Arbitron, Inc. et al
Plumbers and Pipefitters Local Union No. 630 Pension-Annuity Trust Fund |
Arbitron, Inc., Stephen B. Morris and Sean R. Creamer |
1:2008cv04063 |
April 30, 2008 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Securities/Commodities Office |
XX Out of State |
John G. Koeltl |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 129 OPINION AND ORDER: (1) Arbitron's motion to compel disclosure of the names of the CIs is granted. The CIs' names are to be provided to the defense by November 21, 2011. However, Plaintiff's counsel is authorized to submit to the Cour t, by November 21, 2011, an ex parte affidavit setting forth, with particularity, any facts known to Plaintiffs counsel at the time of the initial confidentiality designation that would substantiate the concern that disclosure of a particular CI' ;s name would result in retribution. As to any CI addressed in such affidavit, Plaintiff's obligation to identify the CI to the defense is stayed pending the Court's review of the affidavit. (2) Arbitron's motion to compel production of all documents provided to Plaintiff by the CIs is also granted, to the extent that such documents are responsive to other valid discovery requests in this case. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 11/14/2011) (ab) |
Filing 82 AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER #99476 For the reasons stated above, Creamer's motion to dismiss the plaintiffs' claims against him is granted (and the claims against Creamer are dismissed with prejudice. The motions to dismiss by Arbitron and Morris are denied. The plaintiffs' motion to strike is denied as moot. The clerk is directed to close docket Nos. 56, 59, 62, and 65. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 9/30/2010) (jmi) Modified on 10/1/2010 (ajc). |
Filing 80 OPINION AND ORDER: For the reasons stated above, Creamer's motion to dismiss the plaintiffs' claims against him is granted, and the claims against Creamer are dismissed with prejudice. The motions to dismiss by Arbitron and Morris are denied. The plaintiffs' motion to strike is denied as moot. The clerk is directed to close docket Nos. 57, 61, 63, and 65. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 9/24/2010) (jpo) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.