Arnone v. Ca, Inc. et al
| Michael Arnone |
| Ca, Inc., The CA Severance Plan and Andrew Goodman |
| 1:2008cv04458 |
| May 13, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. Office |
| Nassau |
| Unassigned - CIV |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 29:1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER #97190: The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this motion (Docket Number 22) as well as Docket Number 25, which has been resolved. The Clerk is additionally directed to prepare a judgment consistent with the Opinion and Order of February 13, 2009 and this Memorandum Opinion and Order and to close this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 3/6/2009) (tve) Modified on 3/11/2009 (mro).
|
|
Filing
15
OPINION AND ORDER #97074: For the reasons set forth in this order, judgment is rendered in favor of plaintiff, Michael Arnone, in the amount of $46,693.34 against Good man and the CA Severance Plan and in the amount of $10,000 against Goodm an individually. Arnone is ordered to submit records supporting his claim for attorneys and costs by February 20, 2009. Defendants may submit any objections by February 27, 2009. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 2/13/09) (mme) Modified on 2/17/2009 (mro).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
