Yahoo! Inc. v. XYZ Companies et al
Plaintiff Yahoo! alleges that defendants disseminated mass electronic mail messages claiming that the recipient had won a lottery, prize or other award from Yahoo! Defendants then allegedly lured recipients into sending personal information to them, which was used to access bank accounts and credit cards, apply for credit cards or loans, and create fraudulent identification documents. Defendants also duped the recipients into sending them money for processing and mailing charges.
| Yahoo! Inc. |
| XYZ Companies, John Doe and Jane Doe |
| 1:2008cv04581 |
| May 16, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of State |
| Laura Taylor Swain |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
128
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff's motion for judgment by default is granted, The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendants Nakchan, Chinedu Mbonu, Chibuzor Mhonu, Ausdith Investments Ltd., and Alamin Industrial Corp., jointly and severally, in the total sum of $610,039,500 (comprising a statutory damages award of $27,000,000 under 1117(c), and a statutory damages award of $583,039,500 und er the CAN-SPAM Act). Plaintiff must file and serve its attorneys' fees award request, supported by detailed contemporaneous time records and relevant biographical and billing rate information, with a courtesy copy provided for Chambers, no late r than December 21, 2011. Any opposition to the fee request must be filed, with a courtesy copy for Chambers, by January 23, 2012. Any reply must be filed and served by February 6, 2012. Granting 110 Motion for Default Judgment. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 12/5/2011) (rjm)
|
|
Filing
102
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Defendants' motion to extend the time to file their Answer nunc pro tunc is granted and the Answer filed by the Chen Defendants will not be stricken. This Order resolves the motions docketed as Docket Entries # 81 and # 92. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Theodore H. Katz on 2/22/2011) (jpo)
|
|
Filing
98
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 88 Motion to Dismiss filed by Yahoo! Inc. The Court has reviewed thoroughly Judge Katz's Report and finds no clear error in his recommendation, Accordingly, the Court accepts the Report, Leave to amend having been previously granted, the counterclaim is hereby dismissed with prejudice, This order resolves docket entry no. 88. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 2/1/11) (db)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER...pursuant to FRCP 4(f), Yahoo shall first attempt to serve the Summons and Third Amended Complaint on the Mbonus personally pursuant to FRCP 4(f)(2)(C)(i), and if such service is not successful, Yahoo may serve the Summons and Third Amended Complaint on the Mbonus pursuant to FRCP 4(f)(3) by delivering a copy of the Summons and Third Amended Complaint to Ausdith's registered corporate address. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Theodore H. Katz on 11/10/09) (cd)
|
|
Filing
1
COMPLAINT against XYZ Companies, John Doe, Jane Doe. (Filing Fee $ 350.00, Receipt Number 651739)Document filed by Yahoo! Inc..(mbe) (mbe).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
