Facetime Communications, Inc. v. Reuters Limited Featured Case
Plaintiff: Facetime Communications, Inc.
Defendant: Reuters Limited
Case Number: 1:2008cv04730
Filed: May 19, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Contract: Other Office
County: XX Out of State
Presiding Judge: Colleen McMahon
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 19, 2008 Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Reuters Limited. (Filing Fee $ 350.00, Receipt Number 651982)Document filed by Facetime Communications, Inc.(jeh)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Facetime Communications, Inc. v. Reuters Limited
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Facetime Communications, Inc.
Represented By: Steven Michael Hecht
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Reuters Limited
Represented By: James Frederick Rittinger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?