Cortes v. The City of New York et al
Plaintiff: Frankie Cortes
Defendant: The City of New York, New York City Department of Corrections, Diane Carn, Vernon C. Bain Center, Neil Schulman, Richard Palmer, Jr. and Sadie Smith
Case Number: 1:2008cv04805
Filed: May 22, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: Westchester
Presiding Judge: Unassigned
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 27, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 63 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 46 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by The City of New York, Diane Carn, Neil Schulman, New York City Department of Corrections, Richard Palmer, Jr. For the foregoing reasons, Defendant's motion for summary j udgment is granted in its entirety. This Memorandum Opinion and Order resolves docket entry no. 46. The Clerk of Court is requested to enter judgment in favor of Defendants on Plaintiff's federal claims and declining to exercise jurisdiction of Plaintiff's New York City and state human rights law claims, and close this case. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 3/27/2012) (mro)
March 30, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 30 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part, denying in part 19 MOTION to Dismiss on the Pleadings filed by The City of New York, Vernon C. Bain Center, Diane Carn, Neil Schulman, New York City Department of Corrections, Richard Palmer, Jr . For the reasons set forth in this Memorandum Opinion and Order, Plaintiffs' Title VII claims are dismissed with prejudice insofar as they are asserted against the individual moving Defendants. Plaintiff's sex discrimination-based Section 1981 claims are dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff's Sections 1985 conspiracy claim is dismissed, with leave to replead. Plaintiff's amended complaint must be filed, and a courtesy copy provided for Chambers, by 4/30/2010. Failure to fi le a timely amended complaint will result in the dismissal with prejudice of the conspiracy claim without further advance notice to Plaintiff. Defendants' motion is denied in all other respects. This Memorandum Opinion and Order resolves docke t entry no. 19. The next pretrial conference in this case will be held on 4/16/2010, at 11:00 a.m. The parties must file an updated joint preliminary pretrial statement (and provide a courtesy copy for Chambers) by 4/9/2010. ( Amended Pleadings due by 4/30/2010. Pretrial Conference set for 4/16/2010 at 11:00 AM before Judge Laura Taylor Swain.) (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 3/30/2010) (tro)
May 26, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER, the initial pretrial conference scheduled for 6/8/09, is rescheduled for 7/1/09, at 10:15 am. ( Initial Conference reset for 7/1/2009 at 10:15 AM in Courtroom 11C, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Laura Taylor Swain.) (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 5/22/09) (cd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cortes v. The City of New York et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Frankie Cortes
Represented By: Timothy Patrick Devane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The City of New York
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: New York City Department of Corrections
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Diane Carn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Vernon C. Bain Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Neil Schulman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Richard Palmer, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sadie Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?