Karawia et al v. United States Department of Labor
| Ousama Karawia and International Protective Services Inc. |
| United States Department of Labor |
| 1:2008cv05471 |
| June 17, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Labor: Other Office |
| New York |
| Harold Baer |
| None |
| U.S. Government Defendant |
| 28:1391 Personal Injury |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
36
OPINION AND ORDER #97503: ISI does not meet its burden to establish that unusual circumstances warrant relief from debarment under the SCA. Although the record reflects that ISI has established some of the prerequisites to relief, such as cooperation in the investigations and repayment of monies due, ISI has failed to establish the absence of aggravating factors: ISIs numerous violations of the Act after receiving specific notice about how to comply with it constitutes culpable neglect. Consequ ently, after considering the parties arguments and reviewing the record before me de novo, but with deference for the fact finding below, I conclude that the ARB Decision must be affirmed. Accordingly, ISIs motion for summary judgment is DENIED and the DOLs motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is instructed to close this case and any open motions and remove it from my docket. (Signed by Judge Harold Baer on 5/6/2009) (jpo) Modified on 5/13/2009 (mro).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
