Gordon et al v. George Alexander
| William Gordon, Andrea Combs, Robert DiDonato and Delano Brown |
| George Alexander |
| 1:2008cv05673 |
| June 24, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Sullivan |
| Shira A. Scheindlin |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
OPINION AND ORDER #97784 For the foregoing reasons, defendants' motion to dismiss is granted in full. Plaintiffs have twice failed to present a cognizable claim. Therefore, leave to replead is denied as futile. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this motion (Docket No. 20) and this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 7/21/2009) (jmi) Modified on 7/28/2009 (eef).
|
|
Filing
13
OPINION AND ORDER #96917: For the foregoing reasons, defendants' motion to dismiss is granted in full. Because plaintiffs' complaint hints at potentially cognizable claims, plaintiffs are granted leave to replead. An Amended Complaint may b e filed within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. If no such Amended Complaint is filed, the Clerk of the Court will be directed to close this case. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this motion (Docket No.6). (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 1/5/2009) (jfe) Modified on 1/7/2009 (mro).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
