Martich v. Smith
Petitioner: Franklin Martich
Respondent: Joseph T. Smith
Case Number: 1:2008cv06277
Filed: July 11, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County: Ulster
Presiding Judge: Shira A. Scheindlin
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 14, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 9 OPINION AND ORDER #97738, that for the foregoing reasons, Martich's petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied. The Clerk of the Court is directed to dismiss the petition and close this case. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 7/13/09) (pl) Modified on 7/15/2009 (eef).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Martich v. Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Franklin Martich
Represented By: Susanna Forsythe De La Pava
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Joseph T. Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?