Bilal v. New York City Department of Corrections et al
Shateek Amin Bilal |
New York City Department of Corrections and John Doe |
1:2008cv06664 |
July 28, 2008 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Prisoner: Prison Condition Office |
Westchester |
Denise L. Cote |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 66 OPINION AND ORDER: The City Defendants' February 19, 2010 motion to dismiss is denied as to Bilal's § 1983 claims and denied without prejudice as to Bilal's Rehabilitation Act and ADA claims. The Westchester Defendants' February 19 motion to dismiss is granted. The remaining parties shall submit a joint proposed schedule for the remainder of this litigation no later than May 28, 2010. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 5/10/2010) (jpo) |
Filing 28 ORDER, plaintiff's opposition to the motion shall be due 8/14/09 and reply papers, if any, must be filed by 8/28/09. When filing any papers with the Court, the parties shall provide a courtesy copy to Chambers by sending them to the Pro Se Office..... Set Deadlines/Hearing as to 26 MOTION to Dismiss. MOTION for Summary Judgment. ( Response due by 8/14/2009. Reply due by 8/28/2009.) (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 7/2/09) (cd) |
Filing 17 ORDER: It is hereby ordered that the request is granted. Defendants shall answer or move by June 28, 2009. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 5/14/2009) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (jpo) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.