House of Diamonds, Inc. v. Borgioni LLC et al
House of Diamonds, Inc. |
Borgioni LLC, Livada Diamond Corp., J. Charles and Company, Inc., Joseph Zrelak, Rhonda A. Bartolacci, Tiffany A. Bartolacci and Jan Charles Chrissafis |
1:2008cv06760 |
July 29, 2008 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Contract: Other Office |
New York |
Richard J. Sullivan |
None |
Diversity |
28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 43 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER, re: in conclusion, House of Diamonds' motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 38) is GRANTED, and the Court orders that House of Diamonds be awarded (1) $118,95.50 in damages; (2) pre-judgment interest at 9% p er annum; and (3) post-judgment interest pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961(a). The judgment is against Defendants Zrelak, Livada, J. Charles, and Chrissafis, jointly and severally. The Clerk of Court is hereby ordered to close this case and remove this action from the docket without prejudice to House of Diamonds's ability to enforce this judgment. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ronald L. Ellis on 8/25/10) Copies of this Opinion and Order were sent by chambers. (pl) |
Filing 31 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Accordingly, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. For the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, the Court orders that default judgment be entered again Livada Diamond Corp., J. Charles and Company, Inc. d/b/a J. Charles Custom Jewelers, and Jan Charles Chrissafis. (Signed by Judge Richard J. Sullivan on 8/26/2009) (jfe) |
Filing 30 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS For the foregoing reasons, I recommend that House of Diamonds' Motion for Default Judgment be GRANTED. Pursuant to Rule 72, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Parties shall have ten (10) days after being served with a copy of the recommended disposition to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation. Such objections shall be filed with the Clerk of the Court and served on all adversaries, with extra copies delivered to the chambers of the Honorabl e Judge Sullivan, 500 Pearl Street, Room 615, and to the chambers of the undersigned, 500 Pearl Street, Room 1970. Failure to file timely objections shall constitute a waiver of those objections both in the District Court and on later appeal to the U nited States Court of Appeals. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, ISO (1985); Small v. Sec y of Health and Human Servs., 892 F.2d IS, 16 (2d Cif. 1989) (per curiam); 28 U.SC § 636(b)(l) (West Supp. 1995); FED. R. CIV. P. 72, 6 (a), 6(d). Objections to R&R due by 8/21/2009 (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ronald L. Ellis on 8/4/2009) (jmi) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.