Banks v. Horn et al
Brandon Banks |
Martin F. Horn, Stewart and Benjamin |
1:2008cv07463 |
August 25, 2008 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
Queens |
Richard J. Sullivan |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 43 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: After conducting a thorough review of the Report, the Court concludes that Plaintiff did indeed fail to exhaust his administrative remedies and, in any event, has failed to produce sufficient evidence to supp ort his claim of constitutionally deficient medical care. Therefore, Plaintiffs objections to the Report are rejected and the Report is adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion located at docket number 29, enter judgment on behalf of Defendants, and close the case. (Signed by Judge Richard J. Sullivan on 7/6/2010) (jpo) |
Filing 24 ORDER: A pretrial telephone conference shall be held on April 8, 2009 at 10:00 a.m. Defendants' counsel shall arrange with the correctional facility in which Plaintiff is incarcerated to have Plaintiff Brandon Banks, No. 08 R 3948, made available for this conference, as set forth herein. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Theodore H. Katz on 3/26/2009) (jpo)Copies Mailed to Counsel of Record. Modified on 3/26/2009 (jpo). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.