Pfizer Inc. v. Sachs et al
| Pfizer Inc. |
| Arye Sachs and Jetangel.com |
| 1:2008cv08065 |
| September 18, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Trademark Office |
| New York |
| William H. Pauley |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 15:1051 Trademark Infringement |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is granted with respect to its trademark infringement claim under IS U.S.C. § 1114(1) (First Claim for Relief), false designation of origin claim under 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a) (Second Claim for Relief), federal trademark dilution claim under 15 U.S.C. § 1125(c) (Third Claim for Relief), trademark infringement and unfair competition claims under New York common law (Fourth Claim for Relief), a nd trademark dilution claim under New York General Business Law Section 360-1 (Fifth Claim for Relief). Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is denied with respect to its deceptive acts and practices claims under New York General Business Law Sections 349(a), 350 and 350-a (Sixth Claim for Relief). Plaintiff's application for an award of reasonable attorney's fees under 15 U.S.C. § 1117(a) is granted. The Court will hold a conference on September 23, 2009 at 11:00 a.m. (Signed by Judge William H. Pauley, III on 9/8/2009) Copies Mailed By Chambers.(rw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
