Bishop v. Best Buy, Inc. et al
| Samaad Bishop |
| Best Buy, Inc., John Doe Loss Prevention Manager, John Doe, Green and Four Unknown Police Officers of the City of New York Police Department |
| 1:2008cv08427 |
| October 1, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| Bronx |
| Leonard B. Sand |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
90
ORDER denying 56 Motion for an Order under Title 28 U.S.C. 1292(b) for Certification for Interlocutory Appeal of this Court's October 13, 2010 Memorandum and Order re: 51 Order on Motion to Dismiss ; denying 57 Motion for Reconsideration r e 51 Order on Motion to Dismiss ; granting in part and denying in part 60 Motion for Reconsideration re 51 Order on Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiffs motion for reconsideration is denied. Defendants' motion for reconsideration is granted with respect to Plaintiffs Eleventh, Twelfth, Thirteenth, Fourteenth, Fifteenth, Sixteenth, Seventeenth, Eighteenth, Nineteenth, Twentieth, Twenty-Second, Twenty-Third, Twenty-Fifth, and Twenty-Sixth Claims, which are dismissed, and denied with respect to Plaintiffs other claims. Plaintiff has withdrawn his Seventh, Eighth, and Twenty-Fourth Claims. The City Defendants remain dismissed as parties to this action. Plaintiffs motion to certify this Court's Order of October 13, 2010 for interlocutor y appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is denied. Plaintiff is granted leave to amend the Complaint solely to substitute Defendant Best Buy Stores, L.P. for incorrectly named Defendants Best Buy Co., Inc. and Best Buy Co. of Minnesota. The parties are to advise the court in writing on or before October 15, 2011 as to their proposed schedule for further proceedings in this case. (Signed by Judge Leonard B. Sand on 9/8/2011) (lmb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
