Bear Stearns & Co. Inc. v. Gordon
Plaintiff: Bear Stearns & Co. Inc.
Defendant: Todd Gordon
Case Number: 1:2008cv08596
Filed: July 1, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
Presiding Judge: P. Kevin Castel
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity: Notice of Removal

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 1, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 22 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 5 Defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration. The motions to award fees are DENIED. Proceedings are stayed pending arbitration. This case is placed on the suspense docket. (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 6/30/2009) (jar)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bear Stearns & Co. Inc. v. Gordon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bear Stearns & Co. Inc.
Represented By: Don Abraham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Todd Gordon
Represented By: Stephen M. Plotnick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?