Meserole et al v. Sony Corporation of America, Inc. et al
| Paul Meserole, Brian Miller, Lawrence Monroe, Rhonda Ploubis and Alan Streholski |
| Sony Corporation of America, Inc., Sony Electronics, Inc. and Sony Corp. |
| 1:2008cv08987 |
| October 20, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Contract: Other Office |
| Broome |
| Unassigned |
| Plaintiff |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
OPINION AND ORDER: #97727 Accordingly, Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED as moot. To the extent that any of the legal issues raised by the parties in their memoranda of law related to the motion for reconsideration arise in connec tion with Defendants' motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint, the parties are free to incorporate such arguments into their briefs in support or opposition to the motion. (Signed by Judge Robert P. Patterson on 7/8/2009) Copies Faxed By Chambers.(jfe) Modified on 7/13/2009 (jab).
|
|
Filing
20
OPINION AND ORDER: # 97536 that defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and the Amended Class Action is DISMISSED. Plaintiffs are granted 30 days leave to replead their claims re: 9 MOTION to Dismiss, filed by Sony Corporation of America, Inc., Sony Corp., Sony Electronics, Inc.. (Signed by Judge Robert P. Patterson on 5/18/09) Copies sent by chambers(cd) Modified on 5/21/2009 (jab).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
