Mitre Sports International Limited v. Home Box Office, Inc.
| Mitre Sports International Limited |
| Home Box Office, Inc. |
| 1:2008cv09117 |
| October 23, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Assault Libel & Slander Office |
| XX Out of U.S. |
| George B. Daniels |
| None |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
370
ORDER: Accordingly, for all the foregoing reasons, (1) HBO's objections to the Special Master's Decision and Order are overruled; (2) HBO's application to compel Mitre to produced Kam Raghavan in the District for the continuation of he r deposition is denied unless HBO has more than five hours of questioning for Raghavan; if HBO has less than five hours of questions for Raghavan Mitre is to make her available for deposition via video link at Mitre's expense; (3) Mitre's a pplication to compel further response to it Sixth Set of Interrogatories is denied and (4) Mitre's application to preclude HBO from using the Cottingham declaration is denied. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman on 1/13/2015) Copies Sent By Chambers. (lmb)
|
|
Filing
159
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Accordingly, defendant may serve up to 25 questions on Ms. Parodi-Huml concerning the claims and defenses in this matter. Ms. Parodi-Huml shall have 21 days to respond to those questions; in responding to the questions, M s. Parodi-Huml may assert any objection that could be asserted in response to an interrogatory except an objection based on Local Civil Rule 33.3. Subparts of questions will count against the numerical limit as will improper question to which valid o bjection is made. My Order is without prejudice to a further application to depose Ms. Parodi -Huml by oral examination if her answers to defendant s written questions demonstrate that there is some valid basis for an oral examination. SO ORDERED (Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman on 6/23/2010) Copies trandmitted by Chambers.(jmi)
|
|
Filing
134
OPINION AND ORDER: Counsel for Mitre is directed to advise me no later than the close of business on 4/27/2010 whether Mitre objects to HBO's application for Letters of Request under the Hague Convention which were submitted to the Court on 4/22 /2010. If Mitre objects to the application, it is directed to set forth the bases for its objections. Counsel for Mitre is directed to submitted its response to HBO's application to reopen the Anderson deposition no later than the close of business on 4/29/2010. (Responses due by 4/29/2010) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman on 4/22/2010) Copies Transmitted By Chambers. (tro)
|
|
Filing
128
OPINION AND ORDER It is hereby ORDERED that: 1. With respect to HBO'S application to re-open the deposition of Duncan Anderson, HBO is directed topromptly identify for me areas it was prevented from exploring as a result of Mr. Anderson's a llegedly dilatory tactics, i.e., HBO is to identify the areas itwill explore if the Anderson deposition is reopened. 2. With respect to HBO's request for an extension of time to respond to Mitre's letter dated April 8,2009, counsel for HBO is to confer with counsel for Mitre in a viva voce conversation -- not an exchange of e-mails or faxes -- and advise me whether Mitre consents to the requested extension 3. With respect to the parties' disputes concerning documents withheld or redacted on the ground of privilege or irrelevance, given my responsibilities to the other litigants whose cases are assigned to me, the temporal demands that other discovery disputes in this matter have made and are continuing to make on my calendar and the substantial volume of the parties' disputes concerning withheld and redacted documents, I am compelled to appoint a special master to resolve these disputes. The special master will be compensated at his or her regular hourly rates, th e fee to be evenly divided between Mitre and HBO. Counsel are directed to confer promptly and attempt to agree on the individual to be appointed special master. If the parties cannot agree on an individual to serve as special master, I shall appoint one of my own choosing. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman on 4/15/10) Copies transmitted by Chambers.(djc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mitre Sports International Limited v. Home Box Office, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Mitre Sports International Limited | |
| Represented By: | Jean Kim |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Home Box Office, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
