Graham v. Fischer et al
| Thomas Graham |
| Brian Fischer, Anthony J. Annucci, Lucien J. LeClaire, Jr., Glenn S. Goord and John/Jane Does 1-50 |
| 1:2008cv09634 |
| November 10, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| XX Out of State |
| Unassigned |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
15
OPINION AND ORDER: The imposition by DOCS of PRS on plaintiffs did not violate "'clearly established... constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known,'" Pearson, 129 S.Ct. at 815 (quoting Harlow, 457 U.S. at 818), at the time DOCS imposed that PRS between February 2003 and the Second Circuit decision in Earley v. Murray, 451 F.3d 71. Defendants are thus entitled to qualified immunity for their roles in imposing PRS on these plaintiffs. Similarly, to the extent that Coleman brings claims against defendant parole officers Del Rio, Zwaryczuk, Cudney, Henry, and Martinez for actions taken immediately after the Second Circuit decided Earley, those actions were privileged. The Court has denied plaintiffs& #039; claims for injunctive relief in a separate Order and Opinion dated today and has declined to exercise jurisdiction over the claims for declaratory relief. Accordingly, defendants' motions to dismiss the complaint in each of these three actions are granted. (Signed by Judge Sidney H. Stein on 3/31/2010) (jpo)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
