Marquez v. Artus

Marquez v. Artus

Petitioner:	Miguel Marquez
Respondent:	Dale A. Artus
Case Number:	1:2008cv10847
Filed:	December 15, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County:	Clinton
Presiding Judge:	P. Kevin Castel
Presiding Judge:	Henry B. Pitman
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:	28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 2, 2012	Filing 21 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS : The R & R is adopted in its entirety, and the petition is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of the respondent. Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constit utional right and, accordingly, a certificate of appealability will not issue.This Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and in forma pauperis status is denied. Respondent's counsel is directed to provide petitioner with a copy of the single case cited from the Federal Appendix. (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 3/1/2012) (pl) Modified on 3/2/2012 (pl). Copies mailed to Plaintiff.
September 22, 2009	Filing 8 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: #98060 denying without prejudice to renewal, re: 2 APPLICATION to Appoint Counsel pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3006(A)(g) (Habeas Corpus Petition), filed by Miguel Marquez. Any renewed application should be accompanied by an affidavit establishing the merits. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman on 9/22/09) Copies sent by chambers(cd) Modified on 9/23/2009 (jab).

Date Filed

Document Text

March 2, 2012

Filing 21 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS : The R & R is adopted in its entirety, and the petition is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of the respondent. Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constit utional right and, accordingly, a certificate of appealability will not issue.This Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and in forma pauperis status is denied. Respondent's counsel is directed to provide petitioner with a copy of the single case cited from the Federal Appendix. (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 3/1/2012) (pl) Modified on 3/2/2012 (pl). Copies mailed to Plaintiff.

September 22, 2009

Filing 8 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: #98060 denying without prejudice to renewal, re: 2 APPLICATION to Appoint Counsel pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3006(A)(g) (Habeas Corpus Petition), filed by Miguel Marquez. Any renewed application should be accompanied by an affidavit establishing the merits. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman on 9/22/09) Copies sent by chambers(cd) Modified on 9/23/2009 (jab).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Marquez v. Artus
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Miguel Marquez
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Dale A. Artus
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?