Marco Polo Shipping Co. Pte. Ltd. v. Supakit Products Co Ltd

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Southern District Marco Polo Shipping Co. Pte. Ltd. v. Supakit Products Co Ltd

Marco Polo Shipping Co. Pte. Ltd. v. Supakit Products Co Ltd

Plaintiff:	Marco Polo Shipping Co. Pte. Ltd.
Defendant:	Supakit Products Co Ltd
Case Number:	1:2008cv10940
Filed:	December 17, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Contract: Marine Office
County:	XX Out of U.S.
Presiding Judge:	John G. Koeltl
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:	28:1333 Admiralty

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 4, 2009	Filing 5 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER #97206, because the Court finds that the requirement that the defendant's property be found in the district has not been met, the plaintiff's application to maintain this action and the attachment for an additio nal 60 days is denied. The plaintiff agreed at argument that the only purpose for this lawsuit is to obtain security and that if the Court vacated the attachment, the lawsuit should be dismissed without prejudice. Because there is no longer a basis for the lawsuit, it should now be dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment dismissing this case without prejudice and closing the case. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 3/4/09) (cd) Modified on 3/12/2009 (mro).

Date Filed

Document Text

March 4, 2009

Filing 5 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER #97206, because the Court finds that the requirement that the defendant's property be found in the district has not been met, the plaintiff's application to maintain this action and the attachment for an additio nal 60 days is denied. The plaintiff agreed at argument that the only purpose for this lawsuit is to obtain security and that if the Court vacated the attachment, the lawsuit should be dismissed without prejudice. Because there is no longer a basis for the lawsuit, it should now be dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment dismissing this case without prejudice and closing the case. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 3/4/09) (cd) Modified on 3/12/2009 (mro).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Marco Polo Shipping Co. Pte. Ltd. v. Supakit Products Co Ltd
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marco Polo Shipping Co. Pte. Ltd.
Represented By:	Michael E. Unger
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Supakit Products Co Ltd
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?