Napster, LLC v. Rounder Records Corp.
Plaintiff: Napster, LLC
Defendant: Rounder Records Corp.
Case Number: 1:2009cv00318
Filed: January 13, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Contract: Other Office
County: XX Out of State
Presiding Judge: Paul A. Crotty
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 25, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 24 OPINION AND ORDER, re: 17 MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint. filed by Rounder Records Corp. For the reasons that are set forth in this Order, Rounder's motion to dismiss is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to terminate the case. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Crotty on 1/25/11) (pl)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Napster, LLC v. Rounder Records Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Napster, LLC
Represented By: Jura Christine Zibas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rounder Records Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?