American International Group, Inc. v. United States of America Featured Case
Plaintiff: American International Group, Inc.
Defendant: United States of America
Case Number: 1:2009cv01871
Filed: February 27, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Taxes Office
County: New York
Presiding Judge: Louis L. Stanton
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 26:7422 Refund of Income Tax

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 196 ORDER: This suit having been settled, the Clerk will remove it from the suspense calendar and close the case. So ordered. (Signed by Judge Louis L. Stanton on 10/26/2020) (rro)
April 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 193 ORDER FOR WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEYS: ORDERED, that pursuant to Local Civil Rule 1.4, the following attorneys (and the firm of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP) are withdrawn from this action and no longer will be sent docketing notifications via the ECF system: David Boies, II; Jason Colin Cyrulnik; Ian Michael Dumain; Robin Ann Henry; Edward John Normand; Matthew Lane Schwartz; and Motty Shulman. SO ORDERED. (Attorney Ian Michael Dumain; Robin Ann Henry; Edward John Normand; Matthew Lane Schwartz; Motty Shulman; David Boies, II and Jason Colin Cyrulnik terminated.) (Signed by Judge Louis L. Stanton on 4/24/2020) (rro)
October 6, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 177 OPINION DENYING MOTION IN LIMINE: on re: 168 MOTION in Limine to exclude from trial evidence concerning eight so-called Domestic Transactions, filed by United States of America. Such evidence bears so directly on the issue whether t he foreign transactions had "no business purpose or economic effect other than the creation of tax" benefits, DeMartino v. Comm'r, 862 F.2d 400, 406 (2d Cir. 1988), that it cannot be excluded in advance of trial. In fact, the presentat ion of the domestic transactions need not present extraordinary complexities. The salient point should be whether they have such significant differences from the foreign transactions that the two classes of transactions cannot be usefully compared. T hose differences should be identified and isolated by counsel before trial, at the latest in the joint pretrial order, so that their submission to the jury can be evaluated. The motion to exclude the domestic transactions in limine (Doc. No. 168) is denied, and as further set forth in this order. (Signed by Judge Louis L. Stanton on 10/6/2017) (ap)
March 29, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 124 OPINION AND ORDER re: 109 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment. filed by American International Group, Inc. AIG's motion for partial summary jdugment, Dkt. No. 109, is therefore denied. (Signed by Judge Louis L. Stanton on 3/29/2013) (tro)
February 27, 2009 Filing 1
COMPLAINT against United States of America. (Filing Fee $ 350.00, Receipt Number 680011)Document filed by American International Group, Inc.(laq)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: American International Group, Inc. v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: American International Group, Inc.
Represented By: Lewis S. Wiener
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?