Streetbrains.com, LLC v. LYRIS, Inc. et al
| Streetbrains.com, LLC |
| LYRIS, Inc., LYRIS Technologies, Inc. and Hot Banana Software, Inc. |
| 1:2009cv01980 |
| March 4, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Contract: Other Office |
| New York |
| Kevin Nathaniel Fox |
| Shira A. Scheindlin |
| None |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
38
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER, defendants' motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute is granted as is defendants' request for default judgment. A separate Judgment will be entered with regard to the default judgment. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the motion to dismiss (Document # 31 ) and this case. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 4/18/2011) (lnl)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER Telephone Conference set for 10/14/2009 at 10:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox. The telephonic conference shall be initiated by counsel to the defendants (Signed by Magistrate Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox on 10/8/09) Copies sent by chambers.(cd)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE ON WRITTEN APPLICATION: It is hereby ordered that Donald F. Drummond and Bridget B. Laurent are admitted to practice pro hac vice in this action. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 3/13/2009) (jpo)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
