Rankins v. USA

Rankins v. USA

Petitioner:	David Rankins
Respondent:	USA
Case Number:	1:2009cv02181
Filed:	March 9, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Prisoner: Vacate Sentence Office
County:	Oneida
Presiding Judge:	Kimba M. Wood
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By:	28:2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 11, 2019	Filing 28 OPINION AND ORDER re: 19 MOTION for Reconsideration filed by David Rankins. For the foregoing reasons, Rankins' motion for reconsideration is DENIED. A certificate of appealability will not issue because Rankins has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Kimba M. Wood on 3/11/2019) (ne)
March 12, 2013	Filing 18 OPINION & ORDER: The Court DENIES Petitioners motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to Section 2255. A certificate of appealability will not issue because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. Any pending motions are moot. (Signed by Judge Kimba M. Wood on 3/12/2013) (ft)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 11, 2019

Filing 28 OPINION AND ORDER re: 19 MOTION for Reconsideration filed by David Rankins. For the foregoing reasons, Rankins' motion for reconsideration is DENIED. A certificate of appealability will not issue because Rankins has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Kimba M. Wood on 3/11/2019) (ne)

March 12, 2013

Filing 18 OPINION & ORDER: The Court DENIES Petitioners motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to Section 2255. A certificate of appealability will not issue because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. Any pending motions are moot. (Signed by Judge Kimba M. Wood on 3/12/2013) (ft)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rankins v. USA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: David Rankins
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?