Anderson News, L.L.C. et al v. American Media, Inc. et al
Anderson News, L.L.C. and Anderson Services, L.L.C. |
American Media, Inc., Bauer Publishing Co., LP., Curtis Circulation Company, Distribution Services, Inc., Hachette Filipacchi Media, U.S., Hudson News Distributors LLC, Kable Distribution Services, Inc., The News Group, LP, Rodale, Inc., Time Inc. and Time/Warner Retail Sales & Marketing, Inc. |
1:2009cv02227 |
March 10, 2009 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
XX Out of State |
Unassigned |
Anti-Trust |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1 Antitrust Litigation |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 450 OPINION & ORDER re: Expert Motions. CONCLUSION: For the reasons set forth above, the motion to exclude Professor Guhan Subramanian's testimony is GRANTED. The motion to exclude Dr. Leslie Marx's testimony is GRANTED inpart and DENIED i n part. In light of this Order, and the Order GRANTING Defendants' and Counterclaim Defendants' motions for summary judgment, the Clerk is directed to enter judgment and close this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Crotty on August 20, 2015) (mov) |
Filing 255 OPINION & ORDER re: #103899 216 MOTION to Amend/Correct. CONCLUSION: Accordingly, Plaintiffs' motion to amend the July 17, 2013 Amended Stipulation andConfidentially Order is DENIED. SO ORDERED.(Signed by Judge Paul A. Crotty on 01/14/14) (mov) Modified on 1/28/2014 (ca). |
Filing 202 OPINION & ORDER: In light of the foregoing, the "unique nature" of a bankruptcy examiner's investigation, In re Baldwin United Corp., 46 B.R. 314, 316 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 1985), and the distinctions between such an investigation and the civil discovery process, see In re Ionosphere Clubs, Inc., 156 B.R. 414,432 (S.D.N.Y. 1993), this Court will not involve itself unnecessarily in a dispute involving a duly appointed officer of another court. Accordingly, Defendants' request for an order compelling production of the requested documents is DENIED, without prejudice to their ability raise these issues before Judge Sontchi in the upcoming August 1, 2013 omnibus hearing in the Bankruptcy Action. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Crotty on 7/22/2013) (rsh) |
Filing 184 OPINION & ORDER re: 141 MOTION for Sanctions. For the foregoing reasons, both Defendants' and Anderson's motions are DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion at Docket Number 141. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Crotty on 4/22/2013) (rsh) |
Filing 98 ORDER denying 91 Motion for Reconsideration. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Crotty on October 25, 2010) (mov) |
Filing 89 OPINION & ORDER re: 65 MOTION to Dismiss ("Notice of Motion") filed by Time Inc., Time/Warner Retail Sales & Marketing, Inc., 58 MOTION to Dismiss - Notice of Motion to Dismiss the Plaintiffs' Complaint by Defendants Ame rican Media, Inc., Bauer Publishing Co., LP, Curtis Circulation Company, Distribution Services, Inc., Hachette Filipacchi Media, U.S., Kable Distributi filed by Bauer Publishing Co., LP., 68 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Hachette Filipacchi Media, U.S ., 61 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Distribution Services, Inc., 63 MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint filed by Hudson News Distributors LLC. For the reasons set forth in this Opinion and Order, the Court GRANTS the Defendants' motions to dismiss (docket entries #58, #61, #63, #65, #68) in their entirety and with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close this case. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Crotty on 8/2/2010) (tro) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.