Ortiz v. Ercole
Petitioner: Javier Ortiz
Respondent: Robert E. Ercole
Case Number: 1:2009cv02571
Filed: March 20, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County: Dutchess
Presiding Judge: Richard M. Berman
Presiding Judge: Gabriel W. Gorenstein
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 30, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER: For the reasons stated herein, the Report is adopted in its entirety and the Petition is denied. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully requested to close this case. (Signed by Judge Richard M. Berman on 3/29/2010) (jpo)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ortiz v. Ercole
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Javier Ortiz
Represented By: Stephen N. Dratch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Robert E. Ercole
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?