Bender v. City of New York et al
| Sherry Bender |
| City of New York, Robert Corcoran, Svenstrip and Birol |
| 1:2009cv03286 |
| April 6, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Victor Marrero |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
102
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Before the Court are six motions to dismiss the Amended Complaint of Pro Se Plaintiff Sherry Bender. Defendant's motions to dismiss are Granted in part and Denied in part. Plaintiff is directed to contact Magistrate Judge Peck's chambers to schedule a status conference within 30 days of the entry of this Order. Failure to do so will result in the dismissal of this action. (Signed by Judge Barbara S. Jones on 9/14/2011) (rdz)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER: It is hereby ordered that the Clerk of Court is directed to consolidate the two cases captioned above for all purposes; and it is further ORDERED that all filings in connection with the consolidated action be docketed against the remaining low er number case, 09 Civ. 3286; and it is finally ORDERED that the Clerk of Court close the referenced higher numbered case, 09 Civ. 8880, as a separate action and remove it and any pending motions from the Court's database. (Signed by Judge Victor Marrero on 10/30/2009) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:09-cv-03286-VM-GWG, 1:09-cv-08880-VM(jpo)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
