Burke v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority et al
Plaintiff: Brian Burke
Defendant: Metropolitan Transportation Authority, NYC Transit Authority, Public Employment Relations Board and NY Attorney General Andrew M. Cuomo
Case Number: 1:2009cv03291
Filed: April 6, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Constitutional - State Statute Office
County: New York
Presiding Judge: John G. Koeltl
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 1, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 35 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER:#98298 The Court has carefully considered all of the parties arguments. To the extent not specifically addressed in this Opinion they are either moot or without merit. For the reasons stated above, the defendants motions to dismiss the plaintiffs Third Amended Complaint are granted. The Third Amended Complaint is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk is directed to dismiss any additional pending motions without prejudice as moot. The Clerk is also directed to enter Judgment and to close this case. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 11/24/2009) (jfe) Modified on 12/4/2009 (eef).
October 27, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER that the Court has received the pro se plaintiff's motion to admit his third amended complaint. The defendants should respond by 11/9/09 and indicate whether they oppose the plaintiff's motion and if so, on what grounds. The defendant s should also indicate if their prior motions to dismiss should be directed towards the plaintiff's motion or proposed third amended complaint and should indicate if they wish to make any additions to their prior submissions. The plaintiff may submit a reply, if any, by 11/23/09. Set Deadlines/Hearing as to ( Response due by 11/9/2009. Reply due by 11/23/2009.) (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 10/26/09) (cd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Burke v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brian Burke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Metropolitan Transportation Authority
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NYC Transit Authority
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Public Employment Relations Board
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NY Attorney General Andrew M. Cuomo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?