Chiang v. Potter

Chiang v. Potter

Plaintiff:	Kuo R. Chiang
Defendant:	John E. Potter
Case Number:	1:2009cv03794
Filed:	April 15, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Civil Rights: Other Office
County:	Queens
Presiding Judge:	James C. Francis
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By:	42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 11, 2010	Filing 36 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 28 Motion in Limine. For the reasons set forth above, the defendants motion in limine is: (1) Granted to the extent that the plaintiff is precluded from asserting claims of discrimination on the basis of race or national origin; (2) Denied without prejudice to the extent that the plaintiff may seek to establish a foundation at trial for introduction of evidence concerning the failure to remove derogatory graffiti; (3) Granted to the ext ent that the Court will determine backpay, but denied to the extent that the plaintiff may introduce evidence of denial of the opportunity to earn overtime; and (4) Granted to the extent that lay witnesses may not offer opinions concerning the plaintiff's mental condition, but denied in that these witnesses may testify as to their observations of the plaintiff. (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 8/11/2010) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (tro)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 11, 2010

Filing 36 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 28 Motion in Limine. For the reasons set forth above, the defendants motion in limine is: (1) Granted to the extent that the plaintiff is precluded from asserting claims of discrimination on the basis of race or national origin; (2) Denied without prejudice to the extent that the plaintiff may seek to establish a foundation at trial for introduction of evidence concerning the failure to remove derogatory graffiti; (3) Granted to the ext ent that the Court will determine backpay, but denied to the extent that the plaintiff may introduce evidence of denial of the opportunity to earn overtime; and (4) Granted to the extent that lay witnesses may not offer opinions concerning the plaintiff's mental condition, but denied in that these witnesses may testify as to their observations of the plaintiff. (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 8/11/2010) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (tro)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chiang v. Potter
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kuo R. Chiang
Represented By:	Jeffrey Fleischmann
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: John E. Potter
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?