Gabayzadeh v. Brafman et al
| Mehdi Gabayzadeh |
| Benjamin Brafman, Brafman & Ross, P.C., Brafman & Associates, P.C., Robert F. Katzberg, Kaplan & Katzberg, Jennifer A. Liang and Deborah A. Schwartz |
| 1:2009cv04095 |
| April 27, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of State |
| Paul A. Crotty |
| James C. Francis |
| Plaintiff |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Other |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
98
ORDER ADOPTING R&R for 68 Motion to Dismiss filed by Brafman & Ross, P.C., Benjamin Brafman, Jennifer A. Liang, Brafman & Associates, P.C. The Court has considered Plaintiff's additional objections and finds them to be without merit. Having c onsidered Magistrate Judge Francis's and the accompanying objections, Defendant's motion is GRANTED. Accordingly, the case is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment and close this case. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Crotty on 5/11/2011) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (tro)
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER: (1) Plaintiff's motion to extend time (Docket no. 70) is granted. Plaintiff shall submit answering papers by January 26, 2010. The Brafman defendants shall reply by February 15, 2010. (2) Plaintiff's motion suggests that he has not been served with the Brafman defendants' motion papers (Motion 8). This appears anomalous, given that plaintiff has requested additional time to respond. Nevertheless, to ensure that plaintiff has all relevant documents, a copy of the motion pap ers are being forwarded to him along with this order. (3) Plaintiff's "Motion to Refile Plaintiff's Objections in the Magistrate Judge 9/29/09 Order Preventing the Filing of the First Amended Complaint That Was Served on Defendants on 8/11/09" (Docket no. 58) is denied as moot. By Order dated September 22, 2009, Judge Crotty identified the operative pleading and provided for its filing. (4) Plaintiff's motion for a default judgment (Docket no. 59) is denied. (5) Plainti ff's motion for declaratory relief (Docket no. 62) is denied. (6) Plaintiff's motion to "correct" the docket (Docket no. 63) is denied. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 12/14/2009) Copies Mailed By Chambers.(tve) Modified on 12/14/2009 (tve).
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER, that the motion (by plaintiff to change venue) is denied. (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 10/6/09) Copies sent by chambers.(cd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
